However, the topic on its source of funding from either the government or private companies has always been debatable. ... Government organization should cooperate with … One of the first issues is the knowledge that we gain from research. Governments, rather than private organisations should be the only organisations responsible for funding and controlling scientific research. With an ever increasing need to invest in scientific innovations, it is argued that the government should be responsible for it and not the private organisations. To what extent do you agree? Research pays off in the USA But Kealey`s arguments are based on examination of statistical data from … Scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the governments rather than private companies. Some of the most influential scientific advances came out of the laboratories of … To what extent do you agree or disagree? To what extent do you agree or disagree? Scientific research plays a very important role in the progress of a nation. Without government support, most basic scientific research will never happen. Due to this race of being the best, research gets highest importance and is valued the most. With no dearth of money, they have a greater chance at getting successful outcomes. Government should fund scientific research rather than commercial organisations. Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own experience or knowledge. Governments cannot turn science and technology development over to private industry yet retain the capacity at just the right moment to prevent dangerous outcomes or unintended consequences. ... the government should have the predominant responsibility for this. ), companies doing research and development, and non-profit foundations (e.g., the Breast Cancer Research Foundation, the David and Lucile Packard Foundation, etc. Submit an unlimited number of essays. Write at least 250 words. In conclusion, I believe that a government, either in a developed or a developing country, should invest to build a safer, faster and more reliable transportation system and the railway, for this reason, should get a priority. I believe that there should be a shift in scientific research. On one hand, it is true that scientific research should not be only conducted by the government. In their opinion, only scientific research should be funded, rather than … And anyway, research and development funding is a handout to friends of the current party in power. To what extend do you agree or disagree with the statement? A recent Pew survey highlights a disturbing disconnect: while a majority of Americans support federally funded research, many also distrust science—especially when it comes to … The government should handle basic research, and industry should handle development. Governments should be responsible for funding and controlling scientific research rather than private organizations. Personally I think a third of all scientific research should be privately funded, rather than a third of all scientific research being publicly funded--the percentages should be reversed. Government funding of scientific research should be increased and by a lot. I am absolutely in support of this notion because of its astronomical cost and public safety. Support for … We allocate our funds to things like war and a police state, but we short change science constantly. Although governments have been providing funds and monitoring research, I agree that private organizations would play a better role. Sign up right now and start improving your writing skills. In this essay, I will discuss the reasons why the State has an upper hand in this regard.... Scientific research plays an important role in the advancement of any nation, and requires a lump sum amount to conduct the various investigation trials. Therefore, I completely disagree with the ideology of funding in scientific research as a better option for investment in a commercial organization.... With an ever increasing need to invest in scientific innovations, it is argued that the government should be responsible for it and not the private organisations. This essay disagrees with this premise because the autonomous institutes have a better chance of success in this endeavour. I responded to a presentation by Professor Helga Nowotny, the Vice-President of the European Research Council, saying something like the following:. To what extend do you agree or disagree with the statement? Government should fund scientific research rather than commercial organisations. Funding should be divided in a balanced way. I’m not saying that government-controlled research shouldn’t happen. Therefore, it is very crucial as to how the tax payer's hard earned money spent for the progress of the nation, funding scientific research is generally a costly and time consuming affairs, as compared to investment in commercial organization which yields higher returns on investment. All the services are free for Premium users. The funds for postgraduate research are limited; therefore some people think that the government should provide financial support. This essay disagrees with this premise because the autonomous institutes have a better chance of success in this endeavour. The government should, must, dedicate a lot more money to NASA. ... Another disadvantage related to this is the research process. The Science of Organizations (SoO) program funds basic research that yields a scientific evidence base for improving the design and emergence, development and deployment, and management and ultimate effectiveness of organizations of all kinds. But a new study finds turning to industry partners taints perceptions of university research, and including other kinds of partners doesn't really help. Write at least 250 words. In my view, the government should take the responsibility of handling and funding all the research projects rather than the commercial organizations.... Book: The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+. This essay first explains the ability of the companies to invest abundantly in these efforts as compared to the government, followed by how competition among private companies can ascertain their success in these efforts.... Scientific research plays vital role in the progress of the nation. View collections of IELTS Writing Samples », Book: The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+. State funding helped get Google’s search algorithm, antibody cancer therapies, and DNA sequencing technologies off the ground. To begin with, scientific research works are often expensive and may not … Those who are not in favour of governments being in charge of research argue against it for several … At universities across the United States, cuts in federal research funding are threatening to slow the pace of scientific progress. When asked to weigh the necessity of government as opposed to private investment in research funding, 61% of adults say government funding is essential to ensure that enough scientific progress is made while 34% say that private funding would be enough even without government funding. Yesterday I took part in a Policy Lab at the Royal Society, on the theme The public nature of science – Why and how should governments fund basic research? With an ever increasing need to invest in scientific innovations, it is argued that the government should be responsible for it and not the private organisations. Government is going to research what it is palatable for government research. Scientific research should get more public funding. Each firm experimenting with new technologies to better their products can provide various better quality and innovative products in the market. ). Businesses tend to underinvest in scientific research because it is a public good, so governments use patents, innovation prizes, R&D tax credits, and direct funding of R&D through grants to promote scientific research. The Source of government funds is mostly from the tax paid by the general public. Most scientific research is funded by government grants (e.g., from the National Science Foundation, the National Institutes of Health, etc. In summary, the scientific experimentations can be best performed by the privately-owned firms due to the high availability of monetary resources and the sense of finishing first in the race of innovations. Get more back. Essay topic. The only way an individual can progress is by having a strong and effective scientific research. These arguments are dangerously wrong. Strongly disagree. AIDS cure and cancer treatment, rather than handing out funding for every research proposal. The government should increase the budgets for education and take it away from the arts. Governments should be responsible for funding and controlling scientific research rather than private organizations. This essay first explains the ability of the companies to invest abundantly in these efforts as compared to the government, followed by how competition among private companies can ascertain their success in these efforts. The R&D investment: Invest €1. For example, a recent survey in Denmark noted that the productivity of the private companies in the research field is higher than the state solely due to the amount of spending done by each party. The diminishing budget has been a growing concern for biomedical scientists because the federal government provides nearly two-thirds of funding for science and engineering research, including life sciences research… It is argued that the government ought to take responsibility for the financial and management control of scientific research rather than private institutions. The common belief is that research grant funding comes from I agree, scientific exploration is vital for the advancement of a country and the government is in a better position to conduct scientific studies compared to the private industries. When the funding … And b ecause government funding is an important resource, it would be wiser to limit support to scientific studies with goals relevance in today's society e.g. The country with the best technological and scientific advancements is the one who continues to lead the world. Unlike the political authorities, private firms have enough funds to contribute towards the research and development initiatives. Additionally, the competitive environment in the private sector can do wonders for the economy. Of course, the knowledge that the government makes funding programs available creates an expectation in industry that companies should lobby actively for government support rather than providing their own R&D funds. My apologies to Helga, but my comments are going to be rather … With an ever increasing need to invest in scientific innovations, it is argued that the government should be responsible for it and not the private organisations. A lot of research wouldn't take place without the government To what extent do you agree or disagree? Since organisations do not have these obligations, they can easily allocate a huge amount of fund towards inventions. The main reason is that the scope of scientific research is diverse and wide, and private companies could cover up some research which is not carried out by the governments. These objectives are totally arguable by anyone that scientific research should be helmed by national authority rather than commercial organisations. But cutting out private companies would be a bad idea. 6. SoO funds research that advances our fundamental understanding of how organizations … For example, due to the increasing competition among the large cellphone companies, we have so many mobile devices in the market these days with different features and capabilities. Sample Answer 2: Some believe that a government should build more railroads rather than … Promoting scientific discovery and technological advancement while managing risks also argues for a clear government role. It is argued that research should be controlled and funded by the government, and not private organisations or institutions. ... Second, governmnet invests not only in science but also in many public services, which indicated that the fund for carrying the research is not enough. The ruling party of any nation has responsibilities like providing a better education system, improving the health of the public and ensuring the safety and the security of the country. The ministry is overwhelmed with other focus areas which prevents them for accomplishing the same level of success. Scientists need funding to do their work. Government should leave it to companies to finance the research they need. And there's no way around it. While these estimates vary wildly, the most common for both national and EU investment are around 20% a year - far higher than stock, bond or … Governments should be responsible for funding and controlling scientific research rather than private organizations. Scientific research is expanding worldwide and more people are participating in this area. However, it is also true that a research does not need a clear … Economists have been trying for years to estimate the returns from public investment in research and innovation, around the world. Additionally, some cancer foundations are making a profit off of donations, but if we continue to use federal funds for cancer research then we may find a cure sooner than a for-profit organization would, and the money may be used more responsibly. The US has a model where both parties fund scientific research — the federal government usually around basic research that may or may not have commercial implications, and companies focusing on applied research that directly could lead to new products or services.